Bedeutung endogener Faktoren für Steady-State-Level und Reparatur oxidativer DNA-Modifikationen in Säugerzellen

Die endogene Bildung reaktiver Sauerstoffspezies (ROS) - wie beispielsweise Hydroxyl-Radikale, Superoxid-Radikalanionen, Wasserstoffperoxid und Singulett-Sauerstoff - bei essentiellen Stoffwechselreaktionen in allen aeroben Lebewesen stellt eine potentielle Gefahr für die Integrität der DNA in jeder Zelle dar. ROS generieren in der DNA unter anderem oxidative DNA-Modifikationen (zum größten Teil wahrscheinlich 8-Hydroxyguanin (8-oxoG)), welche wiederum zu einem Teil zu Mutationen führen.In dieser Arbeit wurden Untersuchungen vorgenommen, in welchem Ausmaß zum einen die Steady-State-Level oxidativer DNA-Schäden in Säugerzellen zum anderen die Reparaturgeschwindig-keiten solcher DNA-Modifikationen durch verschiedene endogene Faktoren beeinflußt werden.Im Mittelpunkt der Arbeit stand dabei die Charakterisierung der 8-Hydroxyguaninglykosylase der Säugerzellen. Sie ist das Produkt des OGG1-Gens, das erst 1997 kloniert wurde. In transfizierten Zellinien konnte durch eine konstitutive Überexpression des menschlichen OGG1-Gens demonstriert werden, daß die Reparatur von induzierten oxidativen Basenmodifikationen bis zu dreifach beschleunigt wird und daß eine Korrelation zwischen dem Grad der Überexpression und der Reparaturrate besteht. Dagegen waren die Steady-State-Level der oxidativen DNA-Schäden durch die Überexpression unbeeinflußt. Sowohl bei den spontanen Mutationsraten als auch bei den durch oxidative Schädigungen induzierten Mutationsfrequenzen konnte keine Erniedrigung bedingt durch die hOGG1-Überexpression beobachtet werden.Weitere Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung von Ogg1-Protein konnten in Mäusezellen durchgeführt werden, in denen das OGG1-homologe Mäusegen, mOGG1, homozygot inaktiviert (mOGG1(-/-)) worden war. Hierbei konnte gezeigt werden, daß in den mOGG1-defizienten Zellen im Vergleich zu den entsprechenden Wildtyp-Zellen (mOGG1(+/+)) eine Reparatur induzierter oxidativer Basenmodifikationen erst nach 8 h einsetzt, während in den Kontrollzellen schon nach 3-4 h 50 % der Modifikationen repariert waren. Die Steady-State-Level oxidativer Modifikationen in mOGG1(-/-)-Zellen waren in immortalisierten, schnell proliferierenden Mäusefibroblasten nur um den Faktor 1.4, in primären Mäusehepatocyten jedoch um den Faktor 2.5 gegenüber den Wildtyp-Zellen erhöht.Inwieweit das menschliche Reparaturprotein Xrcc1 (X-ray repair cross complementing group 1) auch an der Prozessierung oxidativer DNA-Modifikationen beteiligt ist, und ob dabei möglicherweise eine Interaktion mit Ogg1 vorliegt, wurde in der XRCC1-defizienten CHO-Zellinie EM9 untersucht. Dabei wurde ermittelt, daß weder die Steady-State-Level noch die Reparaturkinetiken der oxidativen Basenmodifikationen durch die XRCC1-Defizienz beeinflußt werden. Aufgrund weiterer Ergebnisse kann jedoch nicht ausgeschlossen werden, daß das Xrcc1-Protein zumindest am Ligationsschritt während der Reparatur oxidativer DNA-Schäden beteiligt ist.In einem weiteren Schwerpunkt der Arbeit wurde untersucht, ob Unterschiede im Steady-State-Level in Abhängigkeit von Organ-, Gewebe- und Zelltyp auftreten. Dazu wurden Untersuchungen in Bronchialkarzinom-Zellinien verschiedener Subtypen durchgeführt. Des weiteren wurde zur Frage der Zelltyp-Abhängigkeit in der menschlichen Zellinie HL60 der Einfluß des Zelldifferenzierungsstadiums auf die Steady-State-Level untersucht.

Differential cell type-specific transcriptional regulation of the CYP1A1 gene

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) monooxygenase plays an important role in the metabolism of environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs). Oxidation of these compounds converts them to the metabolites that subsequently can be conjugated to hydrophilic endogenous entities e.g. glutathione. Derivates generated in this way are water soluble and can be excreted in bile or urine, which is a defense mechanism. Besides detoxification, metabolism by CYP1A1 may lead to deleterious effects since the highly reactive intermediate metabolites are able to react with DNA and thus cause mutagenic effects, as it is in the case of benzo(a) pyrene (B[a]P). CYP1A1 is normally not expressed or expressed at a very low level in the cells but it is inducible by many PAHs and HAHs e.g. by B[a]P or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Transcriptional activation of the CYP1A1 gene is mediated by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor. In the absence of a ligand AHR stays predominantly in the cytoplasm. Ligand binding causes translocation of AHR to the nuclear compartment, its heterodimerization with another bHLH protein, the aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (ARNT) and binding of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer to a DNA motif designated dioxin responsive element (DRE). This process leads to the transcriptional activation of the responsive genes containing DREs in their regulatory regions, e.g. that coding for CYP1A1. TCDD is the most potent known agonist of AHR. Since it is not metabolized by the activated enzymes, exposure to this compound leads to a persisting activation of AHR resulting in diverse toxic effects in the organism. To enlighten the molecular mechanisms that mediate the toxicity of xenobiotics like TCDD and related compounds, the AHR-dependent regulation of the CYP1A1 gene was investigated in two cell lines: human cervix carcinoma (HeLa) and mouse hepatoma (Hepa). Study of AHR activation and its consequence concerning expression of the CYP1A1 enzyme confirmed the TCDD-dependent formation of the AHR/ARNT complex on DRE leading to an increase of the CYP1A1 transcription in Hepa cells. In contrast, in HeLa cells formation of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer and binding of a protein complex containing AHR and ARNT to DRE occurred naturally in the absence of TCDD. Moreover, treatment with TCDD did not affect the AHR/ARNT dimer formation and binding of these proteins to DRE in these cells. Even though the constitutive complex on DRE exists in HeLa, transcription of the CYP1A1 gene was not increased. Furthermore, the CYP1A1 level in HeLa cells remained unchanged in the presence of TCDD suggesting repressional mechanism of the AHR complex function which may hinder the TCDD-dependent mechanisms in these cells. Similar to the native, the mouse CYP1A1-driven reporter constructs containing different regulatory elements were not inducible by TCDD in HeLa cells, which supported a presence of cell type specific trans-acting factor in HeLa cells able to repress both the native CYP1A1 and CYP1A1-driven reporter genes rather than species specific differences between CYP1A1 genes of human and rodent origin. The different regulation of the AHR-mediated transcription of CYP1A1 gene in Hepa and HeLa cells was further explored in order to elucidate two aspects of the AHR function: (I) mechanism involved in the activation of AHR in the absence of exogenous ligand and (II) factor that repress function of the exogenous ligand-independent AHR/ARNT complex. Since preliminary studies revealed that the activation of PKA causes an activation of AHR in Hepa cells in the absence of TCDD, the PKA-dependent signalling pathway was the proposed endogenous mechanism leading to the TCDD-independent activation of AHR in HeLa cells. Activation of PKA by forskolin or db-cAMP as well as inhibition of the kinase by H89 in both HeLa and Hepa cells did not lead to alterations in the AHR interaction with ARNT in the absence of TCDD and had no effect on binding of these proteins to DRE. Moreover, the modulators of PKA did not influence the CYP1A1 activity in these cells in the presence and in the absence of TCDD. Thus, an involvement of PKA in the regulation of the CYP1A1 Gen in HeLa cells was not evaluated in the course of this study. Repression of genes by transcription factors bound to their responsive elements in the absence of ligands has been described for nuclear receptors. These receptors interact with protein complex containing histone deacetylase (HDAC), enzyme responsible for the repressional effect. Thus, a participation of histone deacetylase in the transcriptional modulation of CYP1A1 gene by the constitutively DNA-bound AHR/ARNT complex was supposed. Inhibition of the HDAC activity by trichostatin A (TSA) or sodium butyrate (NaBu) led to an increase of the CYP1A1 transcription in the presence but not in the absence of TCDD in Hepa and HeLa cells. Since amount of the AHR and ARNT proteins remained unchanged upon treatment of the cells with TSA or NaBu, the transcriptional upregulation of CYP1A1 gene was not due to an increased expression of the regulatory proteins. These findings strongly suggest an involvement of HDAC in the repression of the CYP1A1 gene. Similar to the native human CYP1A1 also the mouse CYP1A1-driven reporter gene transfected into HeLa cells was repressed by histone deacetylase since the presence of TSA or NaBu led to an increase in the reporter activity. Induction of reporter gene did not require a presence of the promoter or negative regulatory regions of the CYP1A1 gene. A promoter-distal fragment containing three DREs together with surrounding sequences was sufficient to mediate the effects of the HDAC inhibitors suggesting that the AHR/ARNT binding to its specific DNA recognition site may be important for the CYP1A1 repression. Histone deacetylase is recruited to the specific genes by corepressors, proteins that bind to the transcription factors and interact with other members of the HDAC complex. Western blot analyses revealed a presence of HDAC1 and the corepressors mSin3A (mammalian homolog of yeast Sin3) and SMRT (silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) in both cell types, while the corepressor NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) was expressed exclusively in HeLa cells. Thus the high inducibility of CYP1A1 in Hepa cells may be due to the absence of NCoR in these cells in contrast to the non-responsive HeLa cells, where the presence of NCoR would support repression of the gene by histone deacetylase. This hypothesis was verified in reporter gene experiments where expression constructs coding for the particular members of the HDAC complex were cotransfected in Hepa cells together with the TCDD-inducible reporter constructs containing the CYP1A1 regulatory sequences. An overexpression of NCoR however did not decrease but instead led to a slight increase of the reporter gene activity in the cells. The expected inhibition was observed solely in the case of SMRT that slightly reduced constitutive and TCDD-induced reporter gene activity. A simultaneous expression of NCoR and SMRT shown no further effects and coexpression of HDAC1 with the two corepressors did not alter this situation. Thus, additional factors that are likely involved in the repression of CYP1A1 gene by HDAC complex remained to be identified. Taking together, characterisation of an exogenous ligand independent AHR/ARNT complex on DRE in HeLa cells that repress transcription of the CYP1A1 gene creates a model system enabling investigation of endogenous processes involved in the regulation of AHR function. This study implicates HDAC-mediated repression of CYP1A1 gene that contributes to the xenobiotic-induced expression in a tissue specific manner. Elucidation of these processes gains an insight into mechanisms leading to deleterious effects of TCDD and related compounds.

Misregulation of the tumour suppressor gene CYLD drives hyperactivation of T cells leading to intestinal pathology

The tumour suppressor gene cyld is mutated in familial cylindromatosis, an autosomal-dominant condition that predisposes to multiple skin tumours. The deubiquitinase CYLD acts as a negative regulator of NF-κB signaling. To analyse the function of CYLD in vivo we used the CYLDex7/8 mice, which are characterized by loss of the full-length transcript and overexpression of a short splice variant of CYLD (sCYLD). In CYLDex7/8 mice the overexpression of sCYLD results in splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Additionally, the B cell population in spleen and lymph nodes is increased at the expense of T cells. Analysis of CYLDex7/8 T cells showed a significant reduction of CD4 single positive (SP) and CD8 SP T cells in the thymus and in the periphery. By investigating the impact of sCYLD in TCR signaling in thymocytes, we could demonstrate that sCYLD partially inhibited the activation of Zap70 and thereby negatively regulated TCR signaling. In vitro as well as in vivo we could show that CD4+ T cells displayed a hyperactive phenotype, proliferated to a better extent than WT cells and expressed high amounts of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-17A. Western Blots of steady state thymocytes and peripheral CD4+ T cells were performed, showing that the noncanonical pathway was highly upregulated visualized by the expression levels of RelB and p100 leading to a hyperactive phenotype of CD4+ T cells. In order to investigate the contribution of sCYLD in positive and negative selection in the thymus in vivo, the HY-TCR transgene (HYtg) was crossed to CYLDex7/8 mice. The analysis of CYLDex7/8 HYtg males revealed an increase in CD4+CD8+ DP as well as in CD8+ SP thymocytes, suggesting a less pronounced negative selection in CYLD mutant mice compared to HYtg control mice. Interestingly, the impaired negative selection in the thymus was accompanied by a strong colitis phenotype at early ages (4 weeks). Since medullary TECs (mTECs) play an important role in the late stage of T cell development by negatively selecting autoreactive thymocytes, the levels of mTECs in the medullary compartment was investigated. Of note, low numbers of mTECs were observed, combined with decreased expression levels of the mTEC markers UEA-1, keratin-5, claudin-3 and claudin-4. The reduction of mTECs in the medullary compartment could explain the inflammatory phenotype of CD4+ T cells in CYLDex7/8 mice leading to the severe intestinal pathology observed in these mice. Taken together, these results show an important role of sCYLD in T cell development and function as well as in NF-кB signaling of T cells.